Posted by Dave on July 15, 2014
A couple of weeks ago, I got a text, followed up with several links titled “Cottage Please” from my wife. She had a few days off and thought it would be nice to rent a cottage for a week for the two of us to hang out at.
I like vacation days as much as anyone – I get 23 days a year (over a month’s worth, for those wondering why I have stayed with the same company for over 10 years). Most years, I use these days to golf, see family and friends, canoe or just relax at home – a rented cottage is something completely different for us. The cottage would cost about $1,000 for a week, which I agreed with my wife was reasonable – for a cottage rental in the first week of July.
Where I kind of questioned the whole thing was why we would be going to a cottage. Neither of us are what you could call “water people” – we don’t spend our days seeking out new and exciting places to float on pool noodles or anything. We also aren’t touristy, seeking out picture-taking opportunities or other day-events in the areas we travel to. Our main interests are sitting around, reading, with some sort of cool beverage in our hand and then eating good food.
At the time of the “Cottage Plan”, my wife was on a heavily restricted diet, in her attempt to rid herself of severe food allergies – she couldn’t really eat anything you would call convenience food. We would have essentially been moving all of our food and stuff from our cupboards and freezer to a different place to cook it.
So, I was generally just not keen on the whole idea. What I did like about it was taking a few days off together to relax, which is what we did. We hung out on our newly renovated patio (we are no longer “those guys with the bad backyard” in our condo complex), read our books and had a nice extra-long weekend, which saved a considerable amount of driving time, rental on a cottage and was probably equally as relaxing.
On one hand, I’m kind of a grinch for just not agreeing to do what my wife wanted me to do – it wasn’t super expensive (we do have money set aside for vacations and other fun stuff) and probably would have been a good time. I’m not sure how to measure “$1,000 of fun”, but I don’t think that on the margin, we had a significantly less relaxing weekend at home (well, there was one trip to our favourite bar to watch a world cup game), than there would have been somewhere by a lake or river. I would like to think that I simply asked – what would we be doing there (in this case), that we couldn’t do for almost free at home?